 | Request for Demo Session |
| Watch Our Intro Video |
Last updated on April 11, 2024
15 mins
2069
Table of Content
Sanity testing, often referred to as a quick and focused subset of regression testing, plays a crucial role in the software testing process. It is conducted to ensure that the critical functionalities of an application are working as expected after minor changes or bug fixes. Unlike comprehensive regression testing, sanity testing focuses on specific areas of the software that are likely to be affected by recent changes, helping testers identify any major issues quickly. According to industry reports, sanity testing can save up to 31% of the overall testing effort by focusing only on critical functionalities.
A survey conducted by a leading software testing organization found that 80% of software defects are detected through sanity testing, highlighting its effectiveness in ensuring software quality.
Also Read: Test Plan in Software Testing?
Sanity testing, a subset of software testing, plays a pivotal role in ensuring that a few critical functionalities of an application work as intended after minor changes or fixes. This type of testing is particularly useful in the later stages of the development cycle, where it serves as a checkpoint to confirm that recent code changes haven't adversely affected existing features. In this overview, we will delve into the concept of sanity testing, its significance in the software testing domain, and its practical applications, all while highlighting key facts and figures to enhance understanding.
Sanity testing revolves around the concept of conducting a narrow and focused set of tests on an application to verify that specific functionalities are operating correctly. Unlike comprehensive testing methods, sanity testing is quick and typically unscripted; it aims to ascertain that the functionalities in question function as expected without delving into exhaustive testing. This approach is particularly beneficial post minor code modifications, bug fixes, or when adding new functionalities to an existing software application.
Sanity testing is often confused with smoke testing, yet there is a nuanced difference between the two. Smoke testing is broader and evaluates all critical functionalities of an application to ensure its stability for further testing. In contrast, sanity testing is more targeted, focusing on specific areas of functionality to confirm they work as intended after a minor change.
A significant aspect of what is sanity testing in software testing is its role in the software development lifecycle (SDLC). It acts as a gatekeeper, ensuring that only stable builds proceed to more rigorous testing phases. This not only saves time and resources but also helps in maintaining the quality of the software product.
When we delve deeper into what is sanity testing in software testing, it's essential to understand its practical application and how it fits into the broader spectrum of software testing. Sanity testing is conducted once a new build is received, after minor changes or bug fixes. The main goal here is to verify that the changes or fixes have been implemented correctly and that they haven't introduced new issues in related functionalities.
One of the key features of sanity testing is its narrow scope. Testers select a specific subset of functionalities based on the changes made to the software. For instance, if a bug was fixed in the login functionality, sanity testing would focus on login and related functionalities to ensure the fix didn't impact those areas negatively.
Sanity testing is often performed by QA (Quality Assurance) teams but doesn't necessarily require elaborate test plans or cases. It's a quick check to validate the rationality and functionality of the software post-change, making it a crucial step in fast-paced development environments where changes are frequent and
In practical terms, sanity testing is applied in various scenarios within the software development lifecycle. For example, after a minor version update, sanity tests would focus on the updated functionalities to ensure they work as intended. Similarly, after a bug fix, sanity tests would concentrate on the affected functionality and closely related features to ensure the fix hasn't inadvertently introduced new issues.
However, it's essential to note that sanity testing is not a substitute for comprehensive testing methods like regression testing or functional testing. Instead, it should be seen as a complementary step that ensures the software is stable enough for further testing.
The core of sanity testing lies in its ability to provide a quick check on the functionality of an application without the need to delve into the comprehensive and time-consuming testing processes. This makes it an invaluable tool in fast-paced development environments where time and resource efficiency are crucial.
Sanity testing helps in identifying defects related to recent changes or updates, ensuring that the new code integrates well with the existing system without causing disruptions. This is particularly important in Agile and iterative development models where changes are frequent and incremental. By catching issues early on, sanity testing helps in reducing the time and cost associated with fixing bugs in later stages.
Moreover, sanity testing serves as a gatekeeper, ensuring that only stable builds move forward to more detailed testing phases. This helps in maintaining the overall quality of the software, as it prevents the progression of builds with critical issues. In turn, this leads to a more efficient development process, as resources can be better allocated to areas that require more extensive testing.
The significance of sanity testing also extends to its role in enhancing customer satisfaction. By ensuring that the key functionalities of the software work as intended after each update or fix, sanity testing helps maintain a stable and reliable product. This not only improves the user experience but also boosts the confidence of stakeholders in the quality and reliability of the software.
While sanity testing is a relatively straightforward process, following certain best practices can enhance its effectiveness and ensure that it serves its purpose within the software development lifecycle.
Define the Scope Clearly: One of the first steps in conducting effective sanity testing is to define the scope of testing clearly. This involves identifying the specific functionalities or sections of the application that need to be tested based on recent changes or updates. A clear scope helps in focusing the testing efforts on areas most likely to be affected by the changes, ensuring a more efficient testing process.
Prioritize Critical Functionalities: Within the defined scope, it's important to prioritize testing on critical functionalities or areas that are crucial to the application's performance. This ensures that any potential issues with these key functionalities are identified early, reducing the risk of major defects in later stages.
Keep Tests Simple and Focused: The essence of sanity testing lies in its simplicity and focus. Tests should be designed to be straightforward and targeted, avoiding unnecessary complexity. This helps in quickly verifying the functionality of the application without getting bogged down in detailed testing procedures.
Document the Results: While sanity testing is often unscripted, documenting the results of the tests is important for tracking purposes and future reference. This documentation can help in identifying patterns or recurring issues, facilitating more efficient troubleshooting and fixes in future development cycles.
Use Experienced Testers: Given the targeted and often unscripted nature of sanity testing, it's beneficial to have experienced testers conduct these tests. Their familiarity with the application and understanding of the potential impact of changes can lead to more effective identification of issues.
Integrate with the Development Process: Sanity testing should be integrated seamlessly into the software development process. It should be conducted immediately after a build is deemed stable enough for testing, serving as a preliminary check before the application moves on to more comprehensive testing phases.
Frequent and Iterative Testing: In line with Agile and iterative development methodologies, sanity testing should be conducted frequently and iteratively. This helps ensure that the application remains stable and functional throughout the development process, especially after each change or update.
Also Read: Incremental vs Iterative Development
Leverage Automation Where Possible: While sanity testing is often manual due to its focused nature, leveraging automation for repetitive or straightforward tests can enhance efficiency. Automated sanity tests can serve as a quick first check, freeing up testers to focus on more complex areas.
To summarise, sanity testing in software testing reveals its indispensable role in the validation of specific functionalities post minor modifications or updates. This targeted approach ensures that critical features remain intact and function as expected, serving as a vital checkpoint before the software progresses to more comprehensive testing stages. The introduction of Automation Testing Courses and Automation Testing Training into the mix significantly elevates the efficiency and effectiveness of sanity testing. By equipping testers with the knowledge and skills to implement automated sanity checks, organizations can achieve quicker turnaround times and higher accuracy in testing outcomes. These educational avenues not only streamline the sanity testing process but also pave the way for a more robust and reliable software development lifecycle. Thus, embracing automation in sanity testing through structured learning and training is a strategic move that promises enhanced software quality and a more agile response to changes in the development environment.
09 Jan 2024
12 mins10 Apr 202415 minsprofessionals trained
countries
sucess rate
>4.5 ratings in Google
